The Mormons Are Coming!
Each year, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints sends 20,000 missionaries around the world. These highly devout Mormon youth are the force behind the rapid expansion of what is arguably now the world’s fastest-growing religion.
At dusk, Elder Mortensen and Elder Warby escort a flock of 19-year-olds on a quick walking tour of their training grounds. Between the dim evening light and the fact that the buildings are all identical yellow-brick structures, Warby concedes, “it takes about a week before you really know your way around.” At the end of the tour, Warby points to the snowcapped mountains beyond the parking lot and the fence: “That’s the outside world,” he says. “You won’t know that again.”
Warby is half joking. This is not a military installation, nor a prison. It’s the Missionary Training Center of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, commonly known as the Mormons. These missionaries-in-training will, of course, know the outside world again, but far from this picturesque 10-acre expanse in Provo, Utah. As in the military, though, recruits go by a title—in this case “Elder,” followed by their last name—and the training is rigorous. “I don’t even know if we have first names anymore,” one missionary quips. “I forgot mine,” another replies. And after two months of doctrinal and foreign-language training, graduates will travel the world as part of the most successful missionary force on the planet. Warby and Mortensen are just two of the 20,000 recruits to come through the training center each year who go on to convert roughly 300,000 people annually.
Missionary service is expected of young Mormon men, who pay $10,000 for two years of training.
Despite the trying mix of social control and social isolation, in addition to the academic demands of learning a foreign language at breakneck speed, the MTC does not lack for volunteers. Recruits pay their own way to the tune of about $10,000 for the two years. It’s like a proselytizing version of the Peace Corps—except the Mormons have seven times as many volunteers in the field as the Peace Corps, and they’re in 145 countries—as opposed to the Peace Corps’ 75. In many parts of the world, a Mormon missionary is the only American the locals will ever meet; the clean-cut, idealistic young face of our nation. With foreign-language fluency and the perpetually sunny demeanor of the true believer, they’re incredibly successful at winning converts. In 1950, there were just one million Mormons; today, there are nearly 13 million.
Benjamin Mortensen was born for this. He grew up in an idyllic Mormon home— his older brothers and his father, the sole proprietor of Stone Mountain Carpet in Farmington, New Mexico, all served in missions. He looks the part, too: Tan, tall, and charismatic, with a sincere intensity in his eyes, Mortensen is a natural missionary. Shorter and paler, with protruding ears exaggerated by the mandatory crew cut, Weston Warby plays sidekick to Mortensen’s superhero. Warby’s parents are active in the Church, but his older brother and sister are not. “As my beliefs grew in the Church, I wanted to share the message,” he says.
“In many parts of the world, a Mormon missionary is the only American the locals will ever meet; the clean-cut, idealistic young face of our nation.”
Already halfway through his training, Mortensen appears to be right at home. “Growing up in the Church, you always have that goal set in your mind,” he says. “But then you have a point you reach in which you have to decide which is more important to you: staying home and continuing your life or going to serve the Lord for two years.” At age 16, he worked with a local missionary to successfully convert a Navajo boy who lived on the reservation near his hometown. No surprise, he’s been tapped to be a Zone Leader, the enforcer of the rules in his dormitory. Ultimately, he plans to go back to college and major in industrial organizational psychology, the study of how to control large groups of people. The MTC, he believes, constitutes a perfect lab. He’s also interested in politics and is closely following the presidential campaign of Mitt Romney, a former governor Massachusetts and a prominent member of the Church, who went to France as a missionary in the 1960s.
Today, he and Warby are relative veterans on-site; just hours earlier, the new recruits wept as they said goodbye to their parents. The welcoming ceremony was reminiscent of a college freshman assembly, with a mix of inspirational exhortations (“You have now joined the ranks of over 53,000 missionaries throughout the world who are carrying out the Lord’s work”) and the mundane details of institutional life (“Don’t lose your meal cards.”) But here you’ll find no floppy-haired nonconformists, little racial diversity, and only a handful of women. Apparently, conformity breeds camaraderie: After one drill, an instructor congratulates his underling: “That was awesome! Damn! Great explanation of why we need to be baptized!”
Though the Church now has more foreign members than Americans, the missionary corps and Church hierarchy remain overwhelmingly white and middle American. Male recruits, with short-cropped “missionary” haircuts and identical dark suits and ties, make up about 90 percent of the missionaries (service is expected of young men and optional for young women). The women wear dresses, sweater sets and skirts, or pantsuits—unified only by their uniform dowdiness.
Despite the fact that the Church has more foreign than American members, the missionary corps is largely white and middle-American.
“You probably noticed an eight-foot fence around the Missionary Training Center,” drawls the tall, grandfatherly President Joseph “F as in foxtrot” Boone, a retired Air Force chaplain who is the religious leader of the MTC. “This is not to keep the missionaries in, but to keep the grandmothers and mothers out.” The joke draws laughs from those who can make out his words over the crying babies. (Because they prohibit birth control, Mormons have apparently developed a remarkable tolerance for screaming babies; Boone himself has nine children.)
Encouraged by the laughter, Boone continues his folksy shtick, though he can’t hide his military background. Referring to the missionary textbook, Preach My Gospel, Boone says, “If you’re not familiar with it, don’t worry. Bright and early tomorrow morning we’re going to give you that opportunity. In fact, I think that you will eat, drink, sleep, and dream about Preach My Gospel while you’re here.” Boone’s full metal jacket-style pep talk is no surprise. Early in his career, he served at lackland air force base in Texas, the installation where new recruits are brought for basic training.
Before hugging goodbye and departing through doorways marked by imitation road signs reading “Family Exit” and “Missionary Exit,” the assembly sings the hymn “Called to Serve Our King,” a reference to the “call letter” each initiate has received, signed by the leader of the Church, exhorting them to “[leave] aside all other personal affairs.” He wasn’t kidding. Weekly letters to parents are encouraged but telephone calls are forbidden. At lunchtime, a female trainee frets about not being able to call her sister, who is about to have a baby. And Elder Warby, who grew up just 15 miles from the MTC, says he feels totally cut off from his friends. “I could be 15,000 miles away for all I know,” he says.
Once in the field, missionaries are permitted to call home just twice a year, on Christmas and Mother’s Day, and during their service they’ll only return home under the most extraordinary circumstances. Brad Burton, a psychotherapist on staff at the MTC infirmary, who allows that he sometimes prescribes antidepressants to missionaries, explains which family deaths would justify a trip home: “Not with grandma, I don’t think. With a parent, I think [so].” Vernon Christopherson, an operations manager at the MTC, agrees, adding that the local mission president would have final say on such a trip. “It would depend on the circumstances.”
Family and friends say their goodbyes; visiting is strictly prohibited throughout training.
Missionaries rise at 6:30 each morning and study more or less straight through until bedtime at 10:30 sharp. Beyond forfeiting control of one’s life to the Church hierarchy, throughout their service, each missionary is assigned a rotating “companion”—a system of constant surveillance that makes it all but impossible to stray. Mortensen and Warby, who were elevated to Zone Leaders four weeks into their sojourn at the MTC, are one such pair. As the little white Missionary Handbook reads, for email “use only MyLDSMail.net, the filtered service established by the Church.… While using computers, always stay next to your companion so that you can see each other’s monitors.”
Perhaps the toughest part of service is learning a foreign language; missionaries are required to learn one of the 50 offered. As President Boone jokes, “I think we can say that the folks at the Tower of Babel did a number on us.” Upon graduation, Mortensen, Warby, and the rest of their class, all of whom wear orange dots on their black nametags, officially called “celestial dots” (though the more experienced trainees refer to them as “dork dots”) will spend the next two years trying to bring people to the faith.
The method of instruction at the center is varied. In an afternoon session, Warby and Mortensen practice speaking Portuguese with Jeff Zwick, a missionary who recently returned from Portugal and is now a student at Brigham Young University who works at the MTC as a language teacher. Zwick roleplays being a Portuguese Mormon who has invited Warby and Mortensen over for dinner, casting himself as a convincing and hilarious Portuguese everyman. First Zwick rants about the unhealthiness of American fast food. In the next breath, he urges the missionaries to eat another heaping portion of his homemade roast pork.
“So where are you from?” Zwick asks Mortensen.
“New Mexico,” he replies.
“I thought you said you were American? I didn’t realize you were a Mexican,” Zwick says, goading Mortensen to explain further.
“What? There are two Mexicos?” Zwick continues, playing dumb and forcing Mortensen to explain more clearly.
Warby and Mortensen arrived at the MTC just five weeks ago without a word of Portuguese between them, but they can already hold their own. Before the meal ends, the missionaries casually ask Zwick if he knows of anyone interested in learning more about the Church. The conversation flows, though slowly.
Elders Mortensen and Warby sit in a meeting at the MTC.
Missionaries are trained to make interactions which are in fact highly scripted seem natural. Another “life rehearsal” involves making a purchase in a department store. The missionaries are instructed to buy something and then chat up the clerk explaining why they’re so far from home in the hope of parlaying it into an appointment to teach them about the Church. In missionary materials, the word “friendship” is turned into a verb. Missionaries are taught that through “friendshipping” individuals, they can enlarge the Church. They are also instructed to tailor the message to the individual. As President Boone explains, “If you had lost a child, we could talk about the eternal nature of the family, and that would appeal to you and resonate in your heart.”
Each week, the missionaries fill out a document noting the number of potential converts they have contacted. The form looks like something out of a Fortune 500 company’s sales and marketing department. The information is then passed up the chain of command all the way to mission presidents. Once a baptism and confirmation are completed, the new convert gets a file at Church headquarters in Salt Lake City. Preach My Gospel urges missionaries to “focus on people [even though you] use numbers” and yet numbers are the key to the Mormons’ proselytization strategy, which is, essentially, “flood the zone.”
“Mormons believe we are living in the latter days, that the end is near. Families are instructed to stock up on canned goods and wheat to prepare for Armageddon.”
On average, each missionary only baptizes six converts a year. But when you send out tens of thousands of missionaries, those numbers add up. Any small evangelical church in the Sun Belt can send members down to Honduras to preach in Spanish. But only the Mormons, due to the scale and sophistication of the MTC, can preach the gospel in Hmong and Haitian Creole. Through their willingness to learn languages no one else studies, the Mormons make themselves available to as many of the world’s peoples as they can. And their willingness to study obscure tongues helps them corner the market on conversions in certain parts of the world.
Lane Steinagel, a middle-aged linguistics scholar, is in charge of language instruction. In the late 1970s, Steinagel served as a missionary in the Cook Islands and discovered his gift for languages. He remains an expert on Cook Island Maori, a language most people haven’t even heard of, let alone studied. Steinagel has also taken classes in Spanish, French, German, Russian, Greek, Latin, Arabic, Korean, Mandarin, Japanese, and Tongan. Under his guidance, the MTC teaches tongues you can study virtually nowhere else. “For some languages we have produced our own printed materials,” Steinagel explained. “It’s hard to find a good text for learning Icelandic or Albanian.”
When the MTC was founded, the staff modeled its language training after the U.S. military’s. Now the military comes to the Mormons. Recent observers have visited the MTC from the Defense Language Institute, West Point, and the Air Force Academy. As Christopherson recounts, “Their question was, ‘How do you get your students to stay in class all day? We can’t go more than about six hours with our students.’ I think the answer is just plain and simple motivation.”
Mormon missionaries are sent to 145 different countries seeking new converts.
Considering so many are willing to serve in such far-flung destinations, one might assume the recruits are a cosmopolitan bunch. But most are from Utah or nearby states and few have much experience traveling abroad. Warby, who says he’s “gone as far east as Illinois,” recounts receiving his call letter: “I started reading my call and I read, ‘Porto, Portugal,’ and the first thing I said was, ‘Wow, I didn’t even think about going to South America!’ And people just kind of looked at me funny. I read it in front of my family. And people were like, ‘Uh, no, I think you’re going to Europe.’” Mortensen, whose sole international experience was a trip to Vancouver, was relieved to also be bound for Europe. One of his older brothers had been sent to Peru and another to South Africa, a nation he summed up simply as “crime and death.” His mother was thrilled. As he explains over a caffeine-free breakfast in the vast MTC cafeteria filled with hundreds of black-suited 19-year-olds, “She was totally relieved when she found out I was going to such a well-civilized place.”
“The strategy of mainstreaming seems all but official Church policy. In his presidential campaign, Mitt Romney has highlighted the similarities between his faith and those of most Americans, at times blatantly misrepresenting what Mormons believe.”
One often gets the sense among the Mormons that time is out of joint. The religion was founded less than 200 years ago, giving Mormonism the missionary zeal of Christianity circa A.D. 200 or Islam circa 800. Like those two groups, the Mormons endured an early period of persecution and then embarked upon a rapid proselytization push. But while Saint Paul trolled the Mediterranean by ship and Roman highway and Muhammad crossed the sands of Arabia on horseback, Mormon missionaries travel to the ends of the earth by 747, lifting off from Salt Lake City International Airport. And there is no time to tarry. Mormons believe we are living in the “latter days,” that the end is near. Mormon families are instructed to stock up on canned goods and wheat to prepare for Armageddon. The Church itself stores 19 million pounds of wheat in a Salt Lake City grain silo.
Saving discussion of the faith’s most difficult sacrifices and most unusual beliefs for late in the conversion process is key. The Mormons are famous for bans not only on smoking, drinking, and premarital sex, but even coffee and tea, yet none of these prohibitions are mentioned in the Church’s visitors’ center on Temple Square in Salt Lake City (which, incidentally, can be reached via a free Church shuttle bus during layover at the Salt Lake airport). At the visitors’ center, only one of the Church’s most unusual claims is presented front and center: that the current president of the Church is a prophet who speaks with and for God, no different from Moses or John the Baptist. At the center, an exhibit on prophecy includes waxworks of Old and New Testament prophets as well as of Joseph Smith, the first Church prophet who lived near Rochester, New York, and founded the faith in 1830. At the end of the exhibit is a blown-up photograph of the church’s current president, a 97-year-old man named Gordon B. Hinckley. He is flanked by his two counselors; his 12 apostles are featured in an interactive computer terminal below. Mormon theology is not discussed in any depth.
This strategy of mainstreaming themselves seems all but official Church policy. After World War II, Mormon apostles shaved the flowing beards that had distinguished them since the founding of the Church. More recently, the Church redesigned its logo to make the words “Jesus Christ” much larger, possibly in an attempt to minimize the differences between Mormonism and traditional forms of Christianity. Mitt Romney has adopted a similar strategy in his presidential campaign. In a Republican primary debate, when asked about his faith, Romney responded, “I believe in God, believe in the Bible, believe Jesus Christ is my savior,” highlighting the similarities between his faith and those of most Americans. At times, he has gone even further, blatantly misrepresenting what Mormons believe. When asked by ABC News where Christ will appear in the Second Coming, Romney responded, “Jerusalem”—not exactly church doctrine.
The MTC’s language training is state of the art; the U.S. military uses it as a model.
“We’re going pretty deep into this theology thing,” President Boone says a bit uncomfortably. When Jesus returns, he says, the New Jerusalem will be located on the Missouri side of suburban Kansas City. “The church has many holdings, property-wise, real estate-wise there,” Boone says. He also confirmed what is arguably the Church’s most unusual teaching of all—the polytheistic doctrine that one day, righteous Mormons will become gods and live with their families forever. As Boone explains, the fifth prophet of the Church taught, “As man now is, God once was. As God now is, man may become.” Boone quotes chapter and verse from the Old and New Testaments to support the claim that Christianity was always intended to be polytheistic, with righteous human beings eventually becoming gods. “In the creation account in Genesis it says, ‘Let us make man in our own image’… and we believe that. I’m not sure about everybody else. When Christ was giving the Sermon on the Mount, he directed them ‘to be perfect, even as their Father in heaven was perfect.’ Well that’s quite a charge. So most Christians would say and most Jews would say and most Muslims would say that we ought to be more God-like in our activities. So where do you draw the line. Is He happy if we’re 5 percent like Him? If we’re 10 percent? Fifty percent? The charge is ‘Be therefore perfect, as your Father in heaven is perfect.’ So we take that very literally and that raises the ire of some. They say ‘You’re dragging God down to human level’ but it’s just the opposite.”
Boone assured me that I, like all people, had the potential to become a god. “The fact is, sure. You would have procreative power, you would have your own offspring, you would create your own worlds.”
“Could I create a universe?” I asked incredulously.
“Absolutely.”
The promise of one day becoming a god is seductive. And Mormonism promises its believers blessings in the here and now as well. “We’re blessed for serving a mission and I look forward to receiving those blessings,” Mortensen tells me matter of factly. As one of his charges puts it: “Our zone is known for obedience. We follow the rules because we want the blessings.”
Relentlessly upbeat, no one at the MTC mentions God’s punishments for disobedience. But the following day, I overhear an elderly Church volunteer explain in hushed tones that the Prophet had told his flock that the drought that has plagued Salt Lake City in recent years is God’s punishment for not keeping the Sabbath holy. “The valley is less than 50 percent Church members at this point,” she confides with a conspiratorial scowl to a fellow Mormon on our tour of the Church’s humanitarian supply center. There is no problem, it seems, that cannot be solved by winning obedient converts for the Church.
In my final Portuguese class at the MTC, Jared Critchfield, a young returned missionary, taught the verb form called the present subjunctive. Critchfield wrote on the board, “The present subjunctive is used to express doubt, uncertainty, emotions, desires, imposition of will, etc.” His examples were, “We ask that You bless us,” and “I hope that we learn the language.” To practice, he had the class stand up and pair off, with one missionary playing Aladdin making wishes, and the other playing the genie granting them, in a human-divine quid pro quo reminiscent of the Church’s own teachings.
The lesson worked. The students quickly got the hang of the present subjunctive. Critchfield never once gave an example of a sentence expressing doubt, or uncertainty.
Like this article? Tell the world It's Good!





not yet rated
Does this really qualify as good?
While I appreciate that the MTC is very proficient in teaching languages and dialogue along very defined guidelines, I question whether they are deserving of a spot in "Good". Does a religion that offers godhood and creation of eternal worlds for men, but offers only eternal motherhood and housewifery for women qualify as Good? Or how about a religion that believes the husband holds the power of resurrection over his wife qualify as good? Or how about a man being allowed to have multiple wives in eternity?
Does eternal inequality sound like something that should be in this magazine? We criticize other religions for inequality, why should this one be ranked as good?
Posted on August 16, 2007 — by ophiolite
1 comment
not yet rated
The actual good
While Ophiolite questions whether the Mormon Church deserves a spot in “Good”, I believe they do, but not an article like this. As a Mormon who served a mission, I question the intent of this article. Is it political? Is it in here merely because Mitt Romney is running for President? (P.S. I’m not voting for him!)
Although it looks like the author did a fair amount of research and most of things are accurate, unfortunately there are also many errors and false statements.
It is too bad that this article focused on making missionaries appear like robots/militants rather than focusing on the actual good of the church. To Ophiolite who thinks the Mormon Church does no good, I’d like him/her to find another church that donates more money or time to humanitarian causes. The Mormon Church has sent relief to victims of over 150 disasters since 1986 alone. Aid is provided regardless of any consideration, including religion, ethnicity, and nationality, and is valued in the tens of millions of dollars annually. In the last 20 years, 200 million pounds of food, clothing, and medicine were donated in 147 countries, almost all to members of other faiths.
So, although I found this article quite interesting, I encourage anyone curious about Mormons to talk to an actual Mormon.
Posted on August 22, 2007 — by bevsmev
1 comment
not yet rated
Good Journalism???
I was very disappointed in the quality of the journalism in this particular article. I would like to think that readers of Good magazine, including myself, are not the kind of readers that like to be spoonfed whatever information seems interesting and is also easy for them to accept. I can understand that there are many right now that would prefer that Mitt Romney not become president. However, I take issue with misleading people about the Mormon faith to further that agenda. Being a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, I have no intention of voting for Mr. Romney because he is a Mormon. On the other hand, I would hope that he would not be vilified just because he is Mormon. There were some things that Mr. Brook said that were mere misrepresentations, but there were many more things which were blatantly false (i.e., there is no "church" policy prohibiting the use of birth control --) It was implicit throughout the entire article that Mr. Brooks viewed individual Mormons as misled themselves -- brainwashed even. It seemed a very thinly veiled attempted to make Mormons appear very ignorant automatons. As a thinking person, and a woman, I find this portrayal of the church very unenlightened. As an aside, I also agree with Ophiolite (who seemed to think that this was "good press" for the Mormon church), that a religion which promised many wonderful things to men, but not to women would not be worth talking about. Fortunately, the Mormon church and its message of hope are worth talking about, if you have your facts straight.
Posted on August 23, 2007 — by coccinelle
0 comments
not yet rated
It IS good!
As a Church member myself I see nothing wrong with this article whatsoever. OK, we don't forbid birth control, but that's about all that's not quite correct. I think it is well written, pretty humorous, with the little exaggeration that would do ourselves well in picturing what outsiders think of this unique and strange-seeming MTC program.
Well done!
Posted on August 27, 2007 — by Julien
0 comments
1 vote
Nice job
I'm with Julien. As a Mormon and returned missionary, I've never heard that we ban birth control. Regardless, nice job!
Posted on August 29, 2007 — by anhhung18901
0 comments
not yet rated
Good?
I just lost all respect for your magazine if you think this is GOOD. Did the author ever stop to think why the missionaries are almost all white male? Or bother to ask anyone? No, because this is not good journalism. Maybe the fact that they are mostly white males has something to do with the fact that Mormons forbid intermarrying amongst races and until recently shunned all non-white people (http://www.lds-mormon.com/racism.shtml). You may say that this isn't true today, but doesn't that hurt the church even more if they hold doctrine so valuable and strict, but feel they can change it whenever the need arises so they can fit into mainstream society? This religion, like many others has its own agenda and does not deserve to be labeled as GOOD.
Posted on September 3, 2007 — by tim
0 comments
not yet rated
Disagree Vehemently
As an orthodox Latter Day Saint, I disagree SIGNIFICANTLY with both the tone and (especially) the content of this article.
To state that birth control is not allowed is factually incorrect. Period. You might find some previous statements denouncing birth control but having studied it, I can state that you can find about 400 quotes, all of different opinions on this topic. The author has made a gross simplification and thus missed the heart of Mormon liberality.
Romney had Mormon doctrine quite right--watch his recent Youtube video and look at the Book of Zechariah. Yes, Christ will eventually come to Missouri, but that is not THE Second Coming. There is NOTHING (at least nothing substantive/definitive) in Mormon scriptures or prophetic teachings that indicate otherwise.
We know very little about what it's like to be a god except that it is much like being a father, only on an eternal scale. I appreciate his words, they shed light on certain topics, but they do not define my faith.
Christ is our Savior--straight-up, no mitigations. I can't think of a way in which he ISN'T our Savior.
And the food storage practice is made to be some kind of apocalyptic weirdness. It serves pragmatic purposes, and the letter from 1940 does not represent church practice now.
Above all, I vigorously reject the general tenor that somehow, we Mormon missionaries are an army of drones, taking our marching orders from military men turned evangelists. Some missionaries did act like that, and they missed the mark. We followed the rules not because we didn't have minds of our own, but because we DID have minds of our own.
The author of this article really needs to get their research down, read some REAL literature on the church, interview real authorities. That is where you will find the heart of the faith; that is why this article is off the mark.
Posted on September 6, 2007 — by russellwades
0 comments
not yet rated
Come now, can't we do better?
While this article does point out some of the rather eccentric and
humorous aspects of Mormon missionary culture, it eventually turns
into a befuddled heap of uncreative and poorly researched journalism.
An article such as this, allegedly opening the world to the strange
secrets of Mormons has been written thousands of times, and especially in the lead up to this election season. Moreover, it needn't be completely
addressed how many basic informational mistakes were made in this
article - that were either not researched well or just not included
for the author's own editorial purposes.
The article, in a way condemns Mormonism for being an imperialistic and dogmatic religion, but the article itself is the one the ends up
having the imperialistic tone. Mormon culture is a strange and new culture,
and since different than the ideals of east coast liberal elitists
(who have obviously reached the apex of human evolution) must be
ridiculed and changed to conform to your ideals. A lack of genuine
understanding and pretension is a strong mark of imperialism, and this
article is a just a more passive form of it all.
Posted on September 7, 2007 — by T-Ljung
0 comments
not yet rated
Tim Get Your Facts Straight
Tim writes:
Maybe the fact that they are mostly white males has something to do with the fact that Mormons forbid intermarrying amongst races and until recently shunned all non-white people . . .
How can I say this delicately? Tim, you got your facts wrong. Until 1978, people of African descent were denied the priesthood in the LDS Church. That is true. Now as appalling as that might sound to people, they were never "shunned" by the LDS Church. In fact, there were African American members of the church prior to 1978. (I was in Brazil in 1972 Helvico Martins and his family--all black--were baptised into the church. He was immediately made President of the Stake Sunday School in Rio--so much for shunning.)
In any event, whatever policy the LDS Church had towards those of African descent, the Church certainly did not "shun" other non-white races, a fact attested to by the fact that the LDS Church was sending missionaries to the Polynesian peoples at least as early as around 1900 if not earlier. Moreover, the Church was sending missionaries to the American Indians when Joseph Smith was still alive--thus, prior to 1844. I could go on and recite facts about the size of church membership in Mexico and Latin American relative to thw whole membership or facts about how long the church has been in Japan, etc. But you get my point: We don't shun non-white people. Our congregations are not and never have been segregated.
Also, about the intermarrying of races thingy. I'm Caucasian, yet I married a woman from Cuba in 1975. In a Mormon Temple. And nobody said a word. Guess they missed the memo.
Haven't read the article yet, so I won't comment.
Posted on September 10, 2007 — by GHT
1 comment
1 vote
POV: Reform-on
Wow. This article is GOOD. What a mini-controversy it has stirred. Tension. Discomfort. So many, active LDS members have responded so passionately here. I would bet 9/10 commentors here are current or former members. Few else know enough to bother commenting.
Hackneyed flattered-protests of the "Saints" are obsequious in their rejections: offended by ommissions but supportive of inclusion, miffed ("you just don't get me") yet smug ("that's right, we're the Chosen"), critical of specifics but placated of the overall, quick to reject it while highlighting their beliefs...
Myopic on the verge of blindness. Probably because they believe that the Countenance of the Godhead and His/Their Messengers cause blindness.
I hope you follow up this article with one about success stories of those recovering from Stockholm Syndrome.
Posted on September 11, 2007 — by superk8
0 comments
not yet rated
mormons
I grew up in the church most of my life but for the last few years ive stopped going due to the many diferent ideas of and about this world and all that; But out of all the things they've told me i can and can not do ive never once been told that im not aloud to take birth control. Ive always been told that you plan to have a family and if your not ready, once married, to have children that any form of birth control (besides abortion) is totally allowed.
Posted on September 12, 2007 — by LouRen
0 comments
not yet rated
BETTER THAN GOOD
This article is fantastic - Ophiolite, it is not the Mormon Church that is GOOD it is the rational and impartial examination of religion in the US press that is so pleasing. Several of the commenters are clearly labouring under the misapprehension that religion and good are not mutually exclusive. Don't read GOOD magazine if you want religious doctrine, this is for people who give a damn about the world and everybody in it - not their own selfish preservation after death or the wellbeing of a select few 'believers'.
The exposure of 'friending' was particularly insightful into the existance these individuals lead. How deeply lonely these young missionaries must be; leading an existence devoid of any genuine human friendship. No wonder they need the comfort of a fictional deity to get them through life.
"I encourage anyone curious about Mormons to talk to an actual Mormon."
I encourage anyone curious about any religion to seek information from an impartial individual who is educated about the faith rather than indoctrinated into it.
There are parallels with military training but this is really just an effective business process and show this church to be like all others - masters of the sale and marketing of delusion
Posted on September 17, 2007 — by UKgoodantitheist07
0 comments
not yet rated
Poor use of data
Throughout the article, the author dazzles us with large round numbers, conjuring up the image of hordes of Mormons sweeping the earth a-la-Genghis Khan. Unfortunately there is no contrast with missionary numbers for other religious groups, rendering the data meaningless. At the very minimum comparing numbers of missionaries trained yearly against other religious movements, and their corresponding numbers of converts would convey the relative effectiveness of this missionary movement
Posted on September 17, 2007 — by ghostmutt
0 comments
not yet rated
Slur on Industrial Psychology
This article states: <<ultimately>>
You owe the Industrial/Organizational Pyschology field an apology. I/O psychologists study human behavior in a work/business setting. To say that field aims to "control large groups of people" is incorrect and clearly indicates a desire to bias the reader with misleading information.
Posted on September 19, 2007 — by dormouse
0 comments
not yet rated
Not like the Peace Corps at all
"Recruits pay their own way to the tune of about $10,000 for the two years. It’s like a proselytizing version of the Peace Corps—except the Mormons have seven times as many volunteers in the field as the Peace Corps, and they’re in 145 countries—as opposed to the Peace Corps’ 75."
As a Returned Peace Corps Volunteer, I'd like to inform Mr Brook that his comparison of Peace Corps Volunteers to Mormon missionaries is off the mark. The most important difference is that PC Volunteers have been invited by the host country to do a specific job (for which they are paid the same salary as local workers). Missionaries, while perhaps tolerated, have not been invited, nor are they hired to work on international projects.
Posted on September 25, 2007 — by cbestland
0 comments
not yet rated
a few missed facts
It's interesting how the author presents true information with slightly misleading twists, which call out his bias. Many have been mentioned, a few haven't. Where do I start?
This is the caption to the second picture: "Missionary service is expected of young Mormon men, who pay $10,000 for two years of training."
First of all, missionary service is encouraged, there are no consequences within the church for making the decision not so serve a mission, it's purely a personal choice one makes. Second (and even more annoying), Missionaries are paying their own living expenses for 2 years, they are NOT paying $10,000 to the church for training. The church makes NO monetary profit from people paying for "training'. They average out the living cost per missionary throughout the world, so each missionary pays a very reasonable monthly living cost, which includes ALL living expenses. For example, I lived in san francisco for 2 years. $10,000 covered all my expenses: rent, food, transportation, medical expenses etc. for 2 years. It's not likely the church was making a profit off of my 'training'. Plus for missionaries who families can't afford the cost, there is a missionary fund donated by members of the church that will pay for their expenses.
Here's another little twist:
"the hymn “Called to Serve Our King,” a reference to the “call letter” each initiate has received, signed by the leader of the Church".
The hymn is called "Called to Serve". The first line of the song is: Called to Serve Him, Heavenly King of Glory. In reference of being called to serve God. Which is a hymn sung by all members of the church, in reference to the fact that God has called everyone to serve Him. It's not a song about saying "Yes sir" to the President of the church. You only receive a mission call from the President of the church after you have requested one.
Then there's the misrepresentations that have been mentioned. It is church doctrine that Christ will return to Jerusalem. Mitt Romney has never said anything publicly to misrepresent church teachings. New Jerusalem will be a second event, after the initial return of Christ, as taught in the bible (Rev. 21:2).-but nice try.
The next issue is how mormons are all stocking up for armageddon. Members of the church are encouraged to have emergency supplies of food and supplies in case just that, EMERGENCIES. Armageddon (as stated in the bible Zech 11, 12), will be a war in the middle east (more specifically the area north of Jerusalem). At no time have church leaders suggested that having a emergency supply of food was in case war broke out to the north of Jerusalem. Rather they have suggested it would be wise in case of emergencies like hurricanes, floods, earth quakes, etc. (we all know those never happen). Maybe you could have mentioned how much aid the church was able to provide for the victims of hurricane katrina, due to its emergency supplies of aid.
The statements about birth control being forbidden, and all missionaries being required to learn at least one language are false, and while not a big deal they show either lack of basic responsible scholarly research motives to persuade rather than report.
Posted on October 6, 2007 — by bossanova
0 comments
not yet rated
typo
I left out the word "or" in that last paragraph which makes it confusing, it was meant to say:
The statements about birth control being forbidden, and all missionaries being required to learn at least one language are false, and while not a big deal they show either lack of basic responsible scholarly research motives OR to persuade rather than report.
Posted on October 6, 2007 — by bossanova
0 comments
not yet rated
one more try
"they show either lack of basic responsible scholarly research OR motives to persuade rather than report."
My lack of scholarship is evident in my poor editing.
Posted on October 6, 2007 — by bossanova
0 comments
not yet rated
Outside of their religious beliefs, which I am not going to comment on, as that is their personal belief. Any mormon I have ever met, has been very polished, almost coyly so. I felt that they were too " nice as pie" but they are good salespeople.
Danny
Memorial gifts
Posted on October 29, 2007 — by dannyboy77
0 comments
1 vote
Even Handed
I used to live at the MTC, and I've got to say this article represented it fairly well; it's hard to write objectively AND not step on any toes.
If ya'll are still curious about Mormons, look at this space: What Do Mormons Believe?
Posted on February 6, 2008 — by Thaddeus
0 comments
not yet rated
Slightly misleading
I liked the article overall, but there are a few errors in it (probably not intentional on the part of the author). I don't agree that the LDS Church was trying to "mainstream" itself after World War II. Many men, not just Mormon men, wore long beards in the late 1800's and early 1900's. The styles changed, that's all. There was, however, an effort by Mormons to reach out more, in an attempt to correct the misconceptions that many people held (and still hold) about them. I don't agree at all that Mitt Romney in any way misrepresented LDS beliefs. And I don't agree that "the missionary corps and Church heirarchy remain overwhelmingly white and middle American". The First Presidency and the Quorum of the 12 (top 15 men in the heirarchy) may fit this profile, but the rest of the heirarchy mainly do not. After the 12 in the heirarchy are the Quorums of Seventy and Area Presidencies all around the world: hundreds of leaders who come from all nations and include all races. As for the missionaries, those at the MTC in Provo mainly fit the "white American" profile because they are mainly FROM states where this is the demographic, but remember there are now 17 MTC's around the world. See
Wikipedia article on Missionary Training Centers
I was in the Provo MTC for two months learning Japanese before serving a mission in Japan back in 1980-81, and my future husband served in the Philippines during the same time period. But most missionaries who are natives of other countries don't come to the Provo MTC for training, and today many American LDS missionaries heading overseas don't get their training in Provo either. My son, from New Mexico, flew straight to the MTC in Johannesburg, South Africa for his 3 weeks of training. His Jo-burg MTC companion was from Idaho, but as he has been serving in Uganda for the past 22 months he has had 10 companions: 1 each from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Botswana, Zambia, Utah, Idaho, New York state, and Virginia (6 black Africans, 4 white Americans). About half of the elders in his mission are from African countries, and I think this pattern holds true for most LDS missions around the world (i.e., about half of the missionaries serving in Japan are native Japanese, more than half of the missionaries serving in Brazil are from Brazil, more than half of those serving in Latin American countries are natives of Latin American countries, the majority of those serving in the Philippines are from the Philippines, and so forth).
Nearly ALL of the sister missionaries in my son's mission are from African countries (see photo of some of them at this link). Many missionaries (or their moms) have made missionary websites at Missionsite.net, so check out some of those and you will see a lot of diversity.
As for the GOOD that the LDS Church and its missionaries do, check out the Church's humanitarian services website, or the blogs & photos of some of these LDS missionary couples throughout the world: Uganda Ghana South Africa South Korea Romania (older, married couples also serve as LDS missionaries, and many of them are writing blogs about their experiences. They don't have as many rules and constraints as the young single missionaries). Or check out the Church's official website in the Africa Southeast Area...LDS missionaries and members donate wheelchairs, make blankets, give vaccinations, donate school supplies, serve in orphanages, build clean water systems for villages, and do many, many other things to serve their fellow men throughout the world. Perhaps the article should have focused more on these GOOD things.
Posted on May 25, 2008 — by keebler
0 comments