response to Andrew Price's post Photoshopping Ethics
Title
Commented on April 9, 2008 by - superfamous


Media
response to Andrew Price's post Photoshopping Ethics
Commented on April 9, 2008 by - superfamous
Magazine
response to Lindsay Utz, Morgan Currie, Ryan Jeffery, Eli Kaufman, Eric Zimmerman, and Noella Boudart's post Happy Meal
Just noticed this post in the Blog:
Seems like a good opportunity for healthy dialogue on this subject.
Commented on March 3, 2008 by - superfamous
Business & Money
response to Andrew Price's post Everything's Free (Including Brothels)
Related: in a short piece by everyone's favorite Senior Maverick at Wired magazine, Kevin Kelly talks about "things that cannot be copied" in an environment where "copies are super abundant and become worthless".
"Even a dog knows you can't erase something once its flowed on the internet."
Commented on February 26, 2008 by - superfamous
Perhaps by now, as most people know fashion photographs are manipulated to the point of the model being a mere inspiration for the eventual image, we no longer have to classify this as "unnatural". The next step in this process is a fully computer generated "photograph", which interestingly enough seems not at all subject to the same criticisms that this type of image manipulation receives right now, simply because the "source person" was never born. Also think about make-up effects and image manipulation in movies... Gollum...CG actors in games...etc.